User talk:J4/proposals: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 14:43, 11 October 2024

Good articles proposal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria

Opening the talk here as well so not everything is stuck on the Discord.

So we are looking at:

What makes a good article?
What pages are included (for instance, Zennirus proposed to not include ProtoFlux pages into it)
How do we implement that

-- J4 14:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

As stated by J4, we could use the criteria used by MediaWiki as a way to select a page to be put into the "Good Article" category. However, the problem arises is... who will be scouring the Resonite Wiki and looking and reading the pages carefully to be put into said category? The next question would be: Who would be certified to place pages into the "Good Article" category?

I also like to note that, ProtoFlux pages can also be included. Perhaps if all of the criteria are meant, it can also be included. I am unsure whether or to include them. Personal idea I suppose. ProtoFlux pages are open to be included in the "Good Article" category as any other pages.

-- Zennirus 22:24, 11 October 2024 (GMT)

I think the Wikipedia way could work, have a group of volunteers that would verify articles, and then decide together if the article matches the criteria.

Editors could also submit pages using the talk page of the "Good Articles" category as well, and get feedback on how to improve the article.

-- J4 [CS] 14:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 -- <span style="text-shadow: 6px 6px 24px #9842ff, -6px -6px 24px #23004d;">[[User:J4|J4]]</span> 14:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
+: As stated by [[User:J4|J4]], we could use the criteria used by MediaWiki as a way to select a page to be put into the "Good Article" category. However, the problem arises is... who will be scouring the Resonite Wiki and looking and reading the pages carefully to be put into said category? The next question would be: Who would be certified to place pages into the "Good Article" category?
-=== Zennirus's Thoughts ===
+: I also like to note that, ProtoFlux pages can also be included. Perhaps if all of the criteria are meant, it can also be included. I am unsure whether or to include them. Personal idea I suppose. ProtoFlux pages are open to be included in the "Good Article" category as any other pages.
-As stated by [[User:J4|J4]], we could use the criteria used by MediaWiki as a way to select a page to be put into the "Good Article" category. However, the problem arises is... who will be scouring the Resonite Wiki and looking and reading the pages carefully to be put into said category? The next question would be: Who would be certified to place pages into the "Good Article" category?
+: -- <span style="text-shadow: 6px 6px 24px #39FF14, -6px -6px 24px #23004d;">[[User:Zennirus|Zennirus]]</span> 22:24, 11 October 2024 (GMT)
-I also like to note that, ProtoFlux pages can also be included. Perhaps if all of the criteria are meant, it can also be included. I am unsure whether or to include them. Personal idea I suppose. ProtoFlux pages are open to be included in the "Good Article" category as any other pages.
+:: I think the Wikipedia way could work, have a group of volunteers that would verify articles, and then decide together if the article matches the criteria.
+:: Editors could also submit pages using the talk page of the "Good Articles" category as well, and get feedback on how to improve the article.
--- <span style="text-shadow: 6px 6px 24px #39FF14, -6px -6px 24px #23004d;">[[User:Zennirus|Zennirus]]</span> 22:24, 11 October 2024 (GMT)
+:: -- <span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#2b0054;color:white;font-family: monospace;"><b>[[User:J4|J4]] [CS]</b></span> 14:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)