Open talk for Module:ProtoFlux, re: Safety of unprotected module code. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Having module code be immediately editable by any registered (+automoderated) user of the wiki could present security concerns, if not properly audited. Should additional protections be implemented here? - [[User:LeoCatto|LeoCatto]] ([[User talk:LeoCatto|talk]]) 05:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC) | Having module code be immediately editable by any registered (+automoderated) user of the wiki could present security concerns, if not properly audited. Should additional protections be implemented here? - [[User:LeoCatto|LeoCatto]] ([[User talk:LeoCatto|talk]]) 05:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
: According to this, it is pretty safe: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Sdyxgj3uj96qm3um . However, if you can list some of the attack vectors you're worried about we can do some additional research. [[User:ProbablePrime|ProbablePrime]] ([[User talk:ProbablePrime|talk]]) 05:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:34, 25 January 2024
RFC: Protection of Modules
Having module code be immediately editable by any registered (+automoderated) user of the wiki could present security concerns, if not properly audited. Should additional protections be implemented here? - LeoCatto (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- According to this, it is pretty safe: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Sdyxgj3uj96qm3um . However, if you can list some of the attack vectors you're worried about we can do some additional research. ProbablePrime (talk) 05:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)