m not awake today |
my ideas and thoughts |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
-- <span style="text-shadow: 6px 6px 24px #9842ff, -6px -6px 24px #23004d;">[[User:J4|J4]]</span> 14:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | -- <span style="text-shadow: 6px 6px 24px #9842ff, -6px -6px 24px #23004d;">[[User:J4|J4]]</span> 14:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
=== Zennirus's Thoughts === | |||
As stated by [[User:J4|J4]], we could use the criteria used by MediaWiki as a way to select a page to be put into the "Good Article" category. However, the problem arises is... who will be scouring the Resonite Wiki and looking and reading the pages carefully to be put into said category? The next question would be: Who would be certified to place pages into the "Good Article" category? | |||
-- <span style="text-shadow: 6px 6px 24px #9842ff, -6px -6px 24px #23004d;">[[User:Zennirus|Zennirus]]</span> 22:24, 11 October 2024 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 14:24, 11 October 2024
Good articles proposal
Opening the talk here as well so not everything is stuck on the Discord.
So we are looking at:
- What makes a good article?
- What pages are included (for instance, Zennirus proposed to not include ProtoFlux pages into it)
- How do we implement that
-- J4 14:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Zennirus's Thoughts
As stated by J4, we could use the criteria used by MediaWiki as a way to select a page to be put into the "Good Article" category. However, the problem arises is... who will be scouring the Resonite Wiki and looking and reading the pages carefully to be put into said category? The next question would be: Who would be certified to place pages into the "Good Article" category?
-- Zennirus 22:24, 11 October 2024 (GMT)